<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: As an SEO, Are You Cleaning the Shark?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webuildpages.com/blog/search-engine-optimization/cleaning-the-shark/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webuildpages.com/blog/search-engine-optimization/cleaning-the-shark/</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 19:00:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Purple Widget</title>
		<link>http://www.webuildpages.com/blog/search-engine-optimization/cleaning-the-shark/comment-page-1/#comment-548</link>
		<dc:creator>Purple Widget</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 20:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webuildpages.com/blog/?p=238#comment-548</guid>
		<description>What happens if you get bit by the shark?  But I couldn&#039;t agree more with the article.  Despite what many people think or say or write (and maybe it just makes for better articles and headlines) Google is not evil - they have a rather significant interest in serving their clients (the searching masses) as well as possible.  Provide them content that their masses will like and follow a few relatively simply rules, ahem...I mean guidelines....and you shouldn&#039;t have a problem!  Except for all the others not playing by the guidelines.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What happens if you get bit by the shark?  But I couldn&#8217;t agree more with the article.  Despite what many people think or say or write (and maybe it just makes for better articles and headlines) Google is not evil &#8211; they have a rather significant interest in serving their clients (the searching masses) as well as possible.  Provide them content that their masses will like and follow a few relatively simply rules, ahem&#8230;I mean guidelines&#8230;.and you shouldn&#8217;t have a problem!  Except for all the others not playing by the guidelines&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Hall</title>
		<link>http://www.webuildpages.com/blog/search-engine-optimization/cleaning-the-shark/comment-page-1/#comment-297</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 00:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webuildpages.com/blog/?p=238#comment-297</guid>
		<description>Excellent article. I think that grasping the fact that an adversarial relationship doesn&#039;t exist is one of the needed steps to attaining SEO maturity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent article. I think that grasping the fact that an adversarial relationship doesn&#8217;t exist is one of the needed steps to attaining SEO maturity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HFdesign</title>
		<link>http://www.webuildpages.com/blog/search-engine-optimization/cleaning-the-shark/comment-page-1/#comment-294</link>
		<dc:creator>HFdesign</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 19:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webuildpages.com/blog/?p=238#comment-294</guid>
		<description>Hey Jen, love  your article. You describe the symbiotic relationship between &quot;good&quot; SEO&#039;s and search engines. And even though they aren&#039;t out there to get the so called &quot;bad&quot; SEO&#039;s. When the exploiting of a loophole real get&#039;s out of hand it will be noticed and will be fixed. This way even the parasite SEO&#039;s will serve their  purpose in  the symbiotic relation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Jen, love  your article. You describe the symbiotic relationship between &#8220;good&#8221; SEO&#8217;s and search engines. And even though they aren&#8217;t out there to get the so called &#8220;bad&#8221; SEO&#8217;s. When the exploiting of a loophole real get&#8217;s out of hand it will be noticed and will be fixed. This way even the parasite SEO&#8217;s will serve their  purpose in  the symbiotic relation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harvey A. Ramer</title>
		<link>http://www.webuildpages.com/blog/search-engine-optimization/cleaning-the-shark/comment-page-1/#comment-290</link>
		<dc:creator>Harvey A. Ramer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 17:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webuildpages.com/blog/?p=238#comment-290</guid>
		<description>I agree, by trial and error (mostly error) I&#039;ve learned that engineering the content and overall strategy is the most important part of the work of content building. I suppose the 20/80 rule applies: Twenty percent of the work (preparation) accounts for eighty percent of the results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, by trial and error (mostly error) I&#8217;ve learned that engineering the content and overall strategy is the most important part of the work of content building. I suppose the 20/80 rule applies: Twenty percent of the work (preparation) accounts for eighty percent of the results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ninjajen</title>
		<link>http://www.webuildpages.com/blog/search-engine-optimization/cleaning-the-shark/comment-page-1/#comment-289</link>
		<dc:creator>Ninjajen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 17:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webuildpages.com/blog/?p=238#comment-289</guid>
		<description>Good question Harvey, my thoughts are almost enough fodder for another post, but I think that the relevance of your content, or social networking, or even linkbuilding is a major factor in establishing pre-qualification. The conversion is then largely a function of usability, site structure and of course the quality of your product/service, customer service, reputation and competitive pricing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good question Harvey, my thoughts are almost enough fodder for another post, but I think that the relevance of your content, or social networking, or even linkbuilding is a major factor in establishing pre-qualification. The conversion is then largely a function of usability, site structure and of course the quality of your product/service, customer service, reputation and competitive pricing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harvey A. Ramer</title>
		<link>http://www.webuildpages.com/blog/search-engine-optimization/cleaning-the-shark/comment-page-1/#comment-287</link>
		<dc:creator>Harvey A. Ramer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 16:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webuildpages.com/blog/?p=238#comment-287</guid>
		<description>I agree that content publishing is the safest, and most sustainable way to build significant traffic to a website. When using this strategy though, it&#039;s easy to get focused on the numbers of visitors and lose sight of the actual business numbers: visitors that become customers via a conversion.

How can we make sure that the content prequalifies potential customers. If we don&#039;t do that, aren&#039;t we just wasting our time?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that content publishing is the safest, and most sustainable way to build significant traffic to a website. When using this strategy though, it&#8217;s easy to get focused on the numbers of visitors and lose sight of the actual business numbers: visitors that become customers via a conversion.</p>
<p>How can we make sure that the content prequalifies potential customers. If we don&#8217;t do that, aren&#8217;t we just wasting our time?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Tutor</title>
		<link>http://www.webuildpages.com/blog/search-engine-optimization/cleaning-the-shark/comment-page-1/#comment-286</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Tutor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 16:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webuildpages.com/blog/?p=238#comment-286</guid>
		<description>nice post. fwiw, the seo egg came before the google chicken</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice post. fwiw, the seo egg came before the google chicken</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paisley</title>
		<link>http://www.webuildpages.com/blog/search-engine-optimization/cleaning-the-shark/comment-page-1/#comment-284</link>
		<dc:creator>paisley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 15:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webuildpages.com/blog/?p=238#comment-284</guid>
		<description>totally great article... with Google&#039;s bounce rate being more of a factor on ranking, providing unique content relevant to search queries as a strategy in SEO can never go wrong.

=)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>totally great article&#8230; with Google&#8217;s bounce rate being more of a factor on ranking, providing unique content relevant to search queries as a strategy in SEO can never go wrong.</p>
<p>=)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
